Get Permission Singhal, Khanna, and Dhand: Is rapid urease test as reliable as histopathological evaluation for Helicobacter pylori Infection- A prospective study?


Introduction

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is a significant global health concern, causing severe illnesses like peptic ulcer disease and stomach cancer. H. pylori continues to be widespread, particularly in areas with poor resources, potentially infecting nearly half of the global population.1

In 1893, Italian researcher Giulio Bizzozero described a spiral bacterium, spirilla, found in dog’s stomachs. In 1899, Walery Jaworski noted bacteria in the human stomach, hypothesizing their link to stomach ulcers and gastric cancer. The significance of these bacteria, later identified as H. pylori, was recognized in the late 1970s when J.R. Warren observed their presence in inflamed gastric mucosa 2 following which in 1983 Warren and Marshall successfully cultured this spiral organism and received a Nobel prize in 2005.

H. pylori can persist in the stomach's acidic environment due to its ability to form a protective biofilm; this results in prolonged colonization, inflammation, and tissue damage.3 Although H. pylori infection frequently leads to chronic gastritis, in some individuals it can result in peptic ulcer disease, non-cardiac gastric cancer, and MALT (mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue) lymphoma.

To diagnose H. pylori infection, multiple tests are used. Invasive methods include the Rapid Urease Test (RUT) and histology, performed during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Non-invasive tests include the Urea Breath Test (UBT) and Stool Antigen Tests (SATs), which previously used an enzyme immunoassay.

Materials and Methods

105 patients with Upper Gastrointestinal (UGI) symptoms underwent endoscopy at MMIMSR in this prospective study. At least, two gastric antral mucosal biopsies were taken from each patient and subjected to the Rapid Urease Test (RUT). The study included dyspepsia patients and patients with other Upper Gastrointestinal (UGI) symptoms not on proton pump inhibitors or antibiotics. Patients with a history of confirmed biopsies, symptomatic cholelithiasis, disturbed gastric physiology, pregnancy, breastfeeding, unwillingness for endoscopy/biopsy, non-compliance, or age less than 18 years were excluded from this study. The results of RUT were compared with histopathological findings from October 2022 to January 2024. Biopsy samples were tested immediately with a rapid urease kit, fixed in formalin overnight, and then processed and stained with H&E and MG for detailed histopathological analysis. The results of RUT were observed for at least an hour.

Results

Gastric biopsies were collected from 105 patients presenting with complaints of dyspepsia and other upper GI symptoms consecutively from October 2022 to January 2024 to measure the efficacy of the Rapid urease test using histopathology as a gold standard method. Out of these cases, 61(58.10%) were and 44(41.90%) were females, with male to female ratio of 1.4:1. Their ages ranged from 18 years to 77 years with a mean age of 42.01±14.76 with the youngest and oldest patient being a female.

Among the various endoscopic findings of these patients, 87(82.8%) had antral hyperemia and among them, 44(50.57%) were associated with H. pylori as given in Table 1. The rest of the findings were pangastritis, gastropathy, polyp, gastric mucosal ulcers, gastric erosion, and esophagitis with their percentage association with H. pylori.

Table 1

Correlation of upper GI endoscopic findings with H. pylori

Endoscopy results

Patients (N, %)

H Pylori Detected (N, %)

Antral hyperemia

87(82.8%)

44(50.57)

Pangastritis

9(8.5%)

7(77.78)

Gastropathy

8(7.6%)

6(75)

Polyp

1(0.9%)

0(0)

Gastric mucosal ulcer

5(4.7%)

3(60)

Gastric Erosions

2(1.9%)

1(50)

Esophagitis

LA Grade A

4(3.8%)

1(25)

LA Grade B

4(3.8%)

2(50)

Among various other symptoms, dyspepsia 86(81.90%) was the major upper GI symptom and remaining were Loss of Weight and Loss of Appetite 3(2.86%), Melena 6(5.71%), Gastric Reflux 2(1.90%), Pain Abdomen 5(4.76%), Hematemesis 1(0.95%), Dysphagia 1(0.95%), Chronic Diarrhea 1(0.95%) with Dyspepsia 1(0.95%).

Among the total number of cases, 52 were true positive, 32 were true negative, 10 were false positive and 10 were false negative (Table 2 ).

Table 2

Association of Rapid urease test with the histopathological detection of H. pylori

Histopathological Detection of H. pylori

Rapid Urease test status

Detected

(N, %)

Not detected

(N, %)

Total

Positive

52 (49.52%)

10 (9.52%)

62 (59.05%)

Negative

11 (10.47%)

32 (30.48%)

43 (40.95%)

Total

63 (60%)

42 (40%)

105(100%)

The sensitivity and specificity of the rapid urease test are 82.54% and 76.19% the Positive predictive value = 83.87%, the Negative predictive value = 74.42% and the predictive validity of the rapid urease test is 80.00%.

Table 3 indicates that a higher density of H. pylori is linked to more severe gastric mucosal inflammation, with the majority of moderate and severe cases showing high bacterial density.

Table 3

Correlation between the Density of H. pylori and Severity of gastric mucosal inflammation

Density of H. pylori

Severity of Inflammation

Total

Mild

Moderate

Severe

0

31 (65.96%)

12 (22.22%)

0 (0%)

43 (40.95%)

1

11 (23.40%)

19 (35.19%)

0 (0%)

30 (28.57%)

2

05 (10.64%)

23 (42.59%)

3 (75%)

31 (29.52%)

3

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

1 (25%)

1 (0.95%)

Total

47 (100%)

54 (100%)

4 (100%)

105 (100%)

Figure 1

Represents age and gender distribution

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/3021ee2c-215f-47a1-b9f5-909a1892225f/image/9259fb2b-fdaa-4859-a698-4d65c32bdd14-uimage.png

Table 4 displays data about the severity of inflammation with the presence of H. pylori. There was a total of 105 instances, with 58.10% being male and 41.90% being female. The H&E staining method revealed that 47.62% of the samples tested positive for H. pylori, but the MG staining method showed a positivity of 60% for H. pylori.

Table 4

Distribution of the 105 patients according to the intensity of inflammation of gastric mucosa, and H. pylori positive and negative staining results by MG and H&E methods

H. pylori Status

Intensity of Inflammation

N, %

H&E

MG

HP Positive

HP Negative

HP Positive

HP Negative

Mild

46 (43.81%)

7 (15.22%)

39 (84.78%)

16 (34.78%)

30 (65.22%)

Moderate

55 (52.38%)

39 (70.91%)

16 (29.09%)

43 (78.18%)

12 (21.82%)

Severe

04 (3.81%)

04 (100%)

00 (0%)

04 (100%)

00 (0%)

Total

105 (100%)

50 (47.62%)

55 (52.38%)

63 (60%)

42 (40%)

Table 5 shows that out of 105 cases, 60% were positive for H. pylori with Modified Giemsa stain, while only 40% were positive with H&E stain. Half of the cases were positive with both stains, and a small percentage were positive with H&E but negative with MG.

Table 5

Association between H&E stain and MG stain for histopathological detection of H. pylori

H Pylori Detected on MG Stain

H Pylori Detected on H&E

Detected

(N, %)

Not detected

(N, %)

Total

(N, %)

Detected (N, %)

50 (47.62%)

0 (0%)

50 (47.62%)

Not detected (N, %)

13 (12.38%)

42 (40%)

55 (52.38%)

Total

63 (60%)

42 (40%)

105(100%)

Statistical analysis of the agreement between H&E and MG stain for the histopathological detection of H. pylori (chi-square = 63.64), P< 0.001. The sensitivity and specificity of the H&E staining are 79.37% and 100.00%, the Positive predictive value = 100.00%, the Negative predictive value = 76.36%, and the predictive validity of the rapid urease test is 87.62%.

Figure 2

Photomicrographs (H&E, 400x) (A & B): depict focal activity (arrow) and moderate mononuclear infiltrates (arrow head) within the Antral mucosae; C): (H&E, 400x) shows intestinal metaplasia with goblet cells (arrow head). D): Shows chronic antral gastritis with mild glandular atrophy and lymphoid follicle; E and F): (H&E, 100x and MG, 1000x), show H. pylori bacilli (arrow head) clinging to the gastric epithelium

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/3021ee2c-215f-47a1-b9f5-909a1892225f/image/dc965297-5976-45e9-8b0c-56c612e27fc6-uimage.png

Discussion

To accurately diagnose H. pylori infection, we need tests with over 90% specificity and sensitivity. The gold standard is histopathological analysis of gastric biopsies. A cost-effective alternative is the RUT.4 This test uses the bacteria’s ability to produce urease, which breaks down urea into ammonia and carbon dioxide, causing a color change in a pH indicator solution. Both rapid urease testing, and histopathology are used to diagnose H. pylori infection, depending on the patient’s condition, available resources, and the specific clinical context. Importantly, these tests can complement each other in clinical practice.

The youngest patient in our study was 18 years old, and the oldest patient was 77 years old with a mean age of 42.01±14.76 years. The mean age group from our study was similar to the studies by Losurdo et al.,5 Yakoob et al.6 and Choi et al.7

58.1% male and 41.9% female patients with a ratio of 1.4:1 was part of this study. This data corresponded to studies by Yakoob et al.,6 Buharideen et al.,8 Dechant et al.,9 and Archimandritis et al.

From the results, 59.05% were positive for rapid urease test and 60% positive on histopathology. This was in concordance with the studies done by Chi‐Chen Fan et al. 10, Archimandritis et al.,11 Yakoob et al. 6 and Karki et al.12 with a slightly higher positivity rate in our study(59.05%). The study by Athavale et al13 showed a higher positivity rate of RUT (84%) which was slightly higher than the positivity rate of histopathology (83%).

Higher sensitivity (82.5%) of the rapid urease test was observed in our study which was also observed in studies done by Chi‐Chen Fan et al.,10 Karki et al.,12 and Athavale et al.13 While, studies done by Archimandritis et al.11 and Yakoob et al.6 show much lower sensitivity (64% and 71.9% respectively). A large gap was noted in our study in terms of specificity, as it was concordant with Athavale et al13 (74.4%) and Yakoob et al.6 (80%) but was much higher in the study by Chi‐Chen Fan et al.10 (100%), Archimandritis et al.11 (93%) and Karki et al.12 (94.4%).

The accuracy of the Rapid Urease Test (RUT) for H. pylori depends on bacterial concentration, biopsy location, and patient factors like recent proton pump inhibitor use. Optimal sampling includes antrum and corpus regions, avoiding metaplastic areas to reduce false negative results.6, 14

False positives in RUT for H. pylori are rare, mainly due to other urease-producing bacteria, especially in low stomach acid environments.15, 16

All of the received gastric biopsies were processed and stained with H&E stain and were reported to be chronic gastritis as per the updated Sydney System.17, 18 All the biopsies showed chronic inflammation in the mucosa. Mononuclear infiltrates were graded into absent, mild, moderate, and severe which were 0%, 43.8%, 52.3%, and 3.8%, respectively.

In our study, 8.5% of cases showed chronic inflammation with activity, with H. pylori detected in 88.8% of these cases. This is similar to the findings of Hassan et al.19 and Sharma et al.20 All of the cases of mucosal atrophy (1.9%) in our study were positive for H. pylori which was much lower in comparison with studies of Hassan et al,19 Sharma el al20 and S. Boldt et al.21

In the study, the higher density of H. pylori is associated with grade 2 and 3 chronic inflammatory infiltrates which is in concordance with studies done by Peng et al.,22 Basir et al.23 and Serhat Sayin.24 Additionally, our work demonstrates a clear correlation between the intensity of H. pylori infection and the extent of chronic gastritis. Therefore, individuals with mild colonization had a significantly lower likelihood of developing severe chronic gastritis compared to those with severe colonization, where the possibility was approximately 25%. However, this relationship was not seen in a study undertaken by Park et al.25 in Korea. This disparity could be attributed to genetic variances, eating preferences, and environmental factors in the study populations.

Another aim of our study was to correlate H&E and MG stain on histopathology for the detection of H. pylori. In our study, the detection rate of H. pylori with H&E was much lower (47.6%) as compared to the MG stain (60%). Our study was supported by the similar positivity rates in studies by S. Boldt et al.,21 Priyadarshini et al.,26 García-Carmona et al,27 and Nadeem et al.28

The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of H&E stain in our study are 79.3%, 100%, 83.8%, and 74.4% respectively. Our study was in concordance with Nadeem et al.,28 García-Carmona et al27 and S. Boldt et al.21 in terms of sensitivity and specificity. A significant association was observed between the H&E stain and MG stain with a p-value of 0.001, a Chi-square (χ2) value equal to 63.6%, and a predictive validity of 87.62%.

Apart from the conventional H&E stain, several sets of stains have been suggested, such as Giemsa, PAS-AB, Warthin-Starry, and IHC stains.29 Nevertheless, several authors recommend auxiliary testing for instances where there is a strong suspicion of H. pylori infection that cannot be seen visually with H&E staining, such as cases with active gastritis or germinal center formation.30

Giemsa is the most widely used special stain and the accepted gold standard for the histopathological detection of H. pylori because it is inexpensive, readily available, and simple to perform. The only downside is the absence of contrast between the bacilli and the surrounding tissue.31

While some writers suggest the regular utilization of immunohistochemistry (IHC) stains to detect H. pylori,32 but, because their application requires a significant amount of time and money most authors suggest their usage only when necessary.29

Conclusion

Histopathologic testing and the Rapid Urease Test (RUT) are both reliable for diagnosing H. pylori in dyspeptic patients. RUT is cost-effective and easy to perform, but it should be used as a preliminary test. False negatives are more common than false positives, so a negative RUT result doesn’t necessarily rule out H. pylori, especially in clinically suspected cases. If RUT results are negative, consider histopathological evaluation using H&E and MG stain for H. pylori detection.

Source of Funding

None.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

1 

JKY Hooi WY Lai WK Ng MMY Suen FE Underwood D Tanyingoh Global Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori Infection: Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisGastroenterology201715324209

2 

JW Konturek Discovery by Jaworski of Helicobacter pylori and its pathogenetic role in peptic ulcer, gastritis and gastric cancerJ Physiol Pharmacol200354Suppl 32341

3 

HC Sharndama IE Mba Helicobacter pylori: An up-to-date overview on the virulence and pathogenesis mechanismsBraz J Microbiol20225313350

4 

YK Wang FC Kuo CJ Liu MC Wu HY Shih SSW Wang Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection: Current options and developmentsWorld J Gastroenterol201521401122135

5 

G Losurdo F Francioso M Pricci B Girardi F Russo G Riezzo A prospective study on Helicobacter pylori rapid urease test false negativity: is it time for its use in restricted situations?Minerva Gastroenterol2022

6 

J Yakoob W Jafri S Abid N Jafri Z Abbas S Hamid Role of rapid urease test and histopathology in the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection in a developing countryBMC Gastroenterol20055138

7 

J Choi CH Kim D Kim SJ Chung JH Song JM Kang Prospective evaluation of a new stool antigen test for the detection of Helicobacter pylori, in comparison with histology, rapid urease test, 13C-urea breath test, and serologyJ Gastroenterol Hepatol201126610539

8 

SM Buharideen S Wijetunge R Kotakadeniya KB Galketiya B Samarasinghe A Dharmapala A low cost rapid urease test to detect Helicobacter pylori infection in resource limited settingsCeylon Med J2015221213

9 

FX Dechant R Dechant A Kandulski M Selgrad F Weber U Reischl Accuracy of Different Rapid Urease Tests in Comparison with Histopathology in Patients with Endoscopic Signs of GastritisDigestion2020101218490

10 

CC Fan CH Chen C Chou TY Kao AN Cheng AYL Lee A time-saving-modified Giemsa stain is a better diagnostic method of Helicobacter pylori infection compared with the rapid urease testJ Clin Lab Anal2020344e23110

11 

A Archimandritis M Tzivras S Sougioultzis I Papaparaskevas P Apostolopoulos A Avlami Rapid urease test is less sensitive than histology in diagnosing Helicobacter pylori infection in patients with non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleedingJ Gastroenterol Hepatol200015436973

12 

BB Karki PR Pande BK Basnet AA Devkota A comparati ve study between Rapid biopsy urease test and histopathological examinati on of Helicobacter pylori in antral gastriti sPostgrad Med J NAMS200991347

13 

VS Athavale V Singh SN Khandalkar DS Nirhale A Lad I Shetty Comparative study of rapid urease test and histopathological examination for detection of H. pylori infectionInt Surg J20174124071

14 

T Uotani DY Graham ME Debakey Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori using the rapid urease testAnn Transl Med2015319

15 

F Perna C Ricci L Gatta V Bernabucci M Cavina M Miglioli Diagnostic accuracy of a new rapid urease test (Pronto Dry), before and after treatment of Helicobacter pylori infectionMinerva Gastroenterol Dietol200551324754

16 

T Osaki K Mabe T Hanawa S Kamiya Urease-positive bacteria in the stomach induce a false-positive reaction in a urea breath test for diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infectionJ Med Microbiol200857Pt 78149

17 

YH Park N Kim Review of Atrophic Gastritis and Intestinal Metaplasia as a Premalignant Lesion of Gastric CancerJ Cancer Prev20152012540

18 

MF Dixon RM Genta JH Yardley P Correa Classification and grading of gastritis. The updated Sydney System. International Workshop on the Histopathology of Gastritis, Houston 1994Am J Surg Pathol19962010116181

19 

TMM Hassan SI Al-Najjar IH Al-Zahrani FIB Alanazi MG Alotibi Helicobacter pylori chronic gastritis updated Sydney grading in relation to endoscopic findings and H. pylori IgG antibody: diagnostic methodsJ Microsc Ultrastruct 20164416774

20 

P Sharma KK Kaul M Mahajan VS Chandail K Goswami P Gupta Histopathological Changes in Gastric Mucosal Biopsies in Chronic Gastritis and Correlation of Pathological Features with Helicobacter Pylori InfectionRes Artic Trop J Pathol Microbiol202081815

21 

MS Boldt RD Pereira AJA Barbosa Histological identification of H. pylori stained by hematoxylin-eosin and Giemsa: Review for quality controlJ Bras Patol Med Lab201551210812

22 

J Peng J Xie D Liu K Yang S Wu D Liu Impact of Helicobacter pylori colonization density and depth on gastritis severityAnn Clin Microbiol Antimicrob202423118

23 

HRG Basir M Ghobakhlou P Akbari A Dehghan MAS Rabiei Correlation between the Intensity of Helicobacter pylori Colonization and Severity of GastritisGastroenterol Res Pract20172017104

24 

S Serhat The Relation between Helicobacter Pylori Density and Gastritis SeverityInt Arch Intern Med20193214

25 

J Park MK Kim SM Park Influence of Helicobacter pylori colonization on histological grading of chronic gastritis in Korean patients with peptic ulcerKorean J Intern Med19951021259

26 

MM Priyadarshini YA Manjunatha S Choudhary G Suba Comparative study using routine stains and Immunohistochemistry staining techniques for detection of Helicobacter pyloriTrop J Pathol Microbiol20184328894

27 

S García-Carmona JC Arango-Viana E Ahumada-Rodríguez J Agudelo-Mesa T Pérez-Cala A Martínez The usefulness of Giemsa staining to diagnose Helicobacter pylori in patients with preneoplastic lesionsRev Colomb Gastroenterol20223744029

28 

S Nadeem N Sultana S Naz M Ali A Gul A Moatassim Comparison of Different Staining Techniques for Identification of Helicobacter Pylori in Gastric BiopsiesInt J Pathol20211912831

29 

SK Patel CB Pratap AK Jain AK Gulati G Nath Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori: what should be the gold standardWorld J Gastroenterol201420361284759

30 

A Makristathis A M Hirschl F Mégraud E Bessède Review: Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infectionHelicobacter201924Suppl 1e12641

31 

JT Anim N Al-Sobkie A Prasad B John PN Sharma I Al-Hamar Assessment of different methods for staining Helicobacter pylori in endoscopic gastric biopsiesActa Histochem2000102212937

32 

RH Lash RM Genta Routine Anti-Helicobacter Immunohistochemical Staining is Significantly Superior to Reflex Staining Protocols for the Detection of Helicobacter in Gastric Biopsy SpecimensHelicobacter20162165815



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article History

Received : 26-07-2024

Accepted : 03-08-2024


View Article

PDF File   Full Text Article


Copyright permission

Get article permission for commercial use

Downlaod

PDF File   XML File   ePub File


Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

Article DOI

https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijpo.2024.051


Article Metrics






Article Access statistics

Viewed: 222

PDF Downloaded: 58



Medical Abbreviation List