Sehgal, Hassan, Khan, Ahmad, and Jetley: An unusual case of peripheral ossifying fibroma of the hard palate


Introduction

Peripheral ossifying fibroma is a slow growing tumor known to occur exclusively on the gingiva. The lesion is more common in females and usually occurs in the first or second decade of life. The most common site reported is the maxillary arch in the incisor cuspid region.1 Here, we report an unusual presentation of this entity on the hard palate in a young male.

Case Report

A 30-year-old male presented to the Otorhinolaryngology outpatient department (OPD) with a lesion in the hard palate. The patient did not give any history of preceding trauma. The lesion was papillomatous, white and firm, and was located in the hard palate near the upper central incisors. Radiological examination revealed a radiolucent lesion with few radiopaque flecks. A clinical diagnosis of Papilloma was made and the excision biopsy was sent to Pathology department. Grossly, a grey white tissue piece measuring 1.8cmx1.0cmx0.7cm was received. The external surface was irregular and no pedicle was identified. The cut section was grey white, solid and firm in consistency. On microscopic examination, the section showed tissue lined by stratified squamous epithelium which was focally ulcerated. [Figure 1] The underlying stroma showed a poorly circumscribed lesion comprising of fascicles of spindle shaped cells (fibroblasts) with intervening bony trabeculae and dysmorphic round bony particles. [Figure 1, Figure 2 ] There was presence of chronic inflammatory infiltrate and interspersed blood vessels. [Figure 1, Figure 2] Thus based on these features, diagnosis of an ossifying fibroma of the hard palate was rendered histopathologically. On follow up, healing was uneventful and no recurrence was observed.

Figure 1

Photomicrograph showing lining of stratified squamous epithelium with underlying lesion showing fascicles of spindle shaped cells with interspersed bony trabeculae. [H&Ex100]

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/b660ff7c-63a3-4006-bfcf-f4b7613c96ba/image/9c9fe579-ca22-4458-b23b-860643344238-uimage.png

Figure 2

Photomicrograph showing fascicles of fibroblasts with interspersed bony trabecula in the centre. Many interspersed blood vessels are also seen. [H&Ex100]. Inset shows high power view of the cells along with bony trabecula [H&Ex400]

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/b660ff7c-63a3-4006-bfcf-f4b7613c96ba/image/95541268-9498-4a6e-901a-7b8b70d27200-uimage.png

Discussion

Ossifying Fibroma is classified into central and peripheral types. Central ossifying fibroma arises from the endosteum or the periodontal ligament adjacent to the root apex. It causes expansion of the medullary cavity. The peripheral type characteristically occurs on the soft tissues covering the tooth bearing areas of the jaws (gingiva). Cases occurring on the palate are uncommon and seldom reported.2, 3

The term “peripheral ossifying fibroma” was given by Eversol and Robin.4 The other terminologies used for this entity include calcifying fibroid epulis, osseous epulis, ossifying fibroepithelial polyp, peripheral fibroma with osteogenesis, peripheral fibroma with cementogenesis, peripheral fibroma with calcification, calcifying fibroblastic granuloma. The term cemento-ossifying fibroma is not preferred, because the clinical presentation and histopathology is the same in areas without cementum (skull, femur, tibia). The lesions which occur in the jaw should not be called cemento-ossifying fibroma just because of their presence in the vicinity of teeth. The term was mainly used because of the presence of dysmorphic round basophilic bone particles, cementicles which are in reality not from the cementum but instead a dysmorphic product of this tumor.5 Moreover, there is no major biochemical or histomorphic difference between bone and cement.

The etiology is local irritants like trauma, calculus, ill-fitting dentures, orthodontic appliances, irregular restorations bacterial plaque on teeth, tobacco chewing, hormonal disturbances.6 The pathogenesis is uncertain. Gingival injury leads to an inflammatory hyperplasia of the cells of the periosteum or periodontal ligament (excessive proliferation of mature fibrous connective tissue). This chronic irritation of periosteal and periodontal membrane causes metaplasia of the connective tissue and results in formation of bone/dystrophic calcification.

The current case was reported in a male even though the lesion has a gender predilection for females. In females, exposure of gingiva to progesterone and estrogen present in the saliva and blood stream may be contributory. However, role of hormones in etiopathogenesis has not been proven yet.

The lesion is thought to occur in young adults and is uncommon in old age because of the loss of periodontium with tooth loss as the age advances.7 However, cases have also been reported in elderly population.8, 9

Peripheral ossifying fibroma, a purely soft tissue process has a neoplastic rather than a reactive etiology. It presents as a nodular lesion which is often ulcerated. It may be sessile or pedunculated and varies from red to pink in colour. It is often asymptomatic and therefore present for many years before it is diagnosed.

Lesions which present with rapid growth must be properly diagnosed to rule out the possibility of malignancy which has similar growth potential. Clinically, the differential diagnosis includes pyogenic granuloma, peripheral giant cell granuloma, odontogenic tumors. Since clinical presentation of all these lesions is similar, histopathological examination is indispensible for the correct diagnosis. Pyogenic granuloma presents like a red mass with surface ulceration and microscopically shows vascular proliferation. Peripheral giant cell granuloma characteristically shows scattered giant cells in a fibrous stroma. Peripheral odontogenic fibroma shows prominent islands of odontogenic epithelium.

Treatment is complete surgical excision and aggressive curettage of the adjacent tissues to prevent recurrence. Elimination of any associated irritating factors should also be done. The reported rate of recurrence is 20%.10

Source of Funding

None.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

References

1 

Neville Textbook of oral and maxillofacial Pathology2nd edition200445452

2 

BN Satish P Kumar Peripheral ossifying fibroma of Hard palate - a case reportInt J Dent Clin20102304

3 

P Agarwal A Chug S Kumar K Jain Palatal peripheral ossifying fibroma: A rare occurrenceInt J Health Sci201913636

4 

LR Eversole S Rovin Reactive lesions of the gingivaJ Oral Pathol Med19721308

5 

KK Ganji AKB Chakki SC Nagaral E Verma Peripheral Cemento-Ossifying Fibroma: Case Series Literature ReviewCase Rep Dent201320131510.1155/2013/930870

6 

M Arunachalam T Saravanan KR Shakila N Anisa Peripheral ossifying fibroma: A case report and brief reviewSRM J Res Dent Sci20178415

7 

GV Reddy J Reddy G Ramlal M Ambati Peripheral ossifying fibroma: Report of two unusual casesIndian J Stomatol201121303

8 

V Keluskar R Byakodi N Shah Peripheral ossifying fibromaJ Indian Acad Oral Med Radiol200820254610.4103/0972-1363.44365

9 

S Sinha SPR Enja S Chandra S Nethan Peripheral cemento-ossifying fibroma: Report of a case in an elderly patientJ Indian Acad Oral Med Radiol2014262204810.4103/0972-1363.143703

10 

AP Singh MS Raju M Mittal Peripheral ossifying fibroma: A case reportJ Nepal Dent Assoc201011702



jats-html.xsl

© 2021 Published by Innovative Publication Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (creativecommons.org)


  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

View Article

PDF File   Full Text Article


Copyright permission

Get article permission for commercial use

Downlaod

PDF File   XML File   ePub File


Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

Article DOI

https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijpo.2021.030


Article Metrics






Article Access statistics

Viewed: 28

PDF Downloaded: 9